Legal Opinion

Robert Fox v. Warden, FCI Berlin

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided August 22, 2022No. 21-cv-158-SEPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robert Fox v. Civil No. 21-cv-158-SE Opinion No.

2022 DNH 100

Warden, FCI Berlin O R D E R Robert Fox, proceeding pro se, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging disciplinary proceedings that resulted in his loss of 27 days of good conduct time and a fine. The warden moves for summary judgment, arguing that Fox failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies. Doc. no. 21. Fox objects. For the following reasons, the warden’s motion is granted. Standard of Review Summary judgment is appropriate “if the movant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Acosta v. United States Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Cantrall v. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fox v. FCI Berlin, WardenDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API