Tower Hill Preferred Insurance Co. v. Cabrera

The appellant challenges a final judgment, contending that the court erred in admitting store receipts and photocopies of checks into evidence. We affirm, applying the tipsy coachman doctrine.1 Where store *863receipts have distinctive- logos and are identified by the purchaser as the receipts of the actual items purchased at the store by the purchaser, they are sufficiently authenticated and admissible to corroborate the testimony of the purchaser regarding the purchase. See Gosciminski v. State, 132 So.3d 678, 700 (Fla. 2013). Photocopies of cancelled checks are admissible as a duplicate of the…