Deramus v. State

PETERSON, Judge.

Antonio Cyril Deramus appeals three 30 year concurrent habitual offender sentences.

Deramus and the state entered a plea agreement pursuant to which a guidelines sentence was conditioned upon Deramus’ providing substantial assistance to the state. Upon Deramus’ failure to provide substantial assistance the court imposed the habitual offender sentences. In this appeal Deramus argues his habitual offender sentences violate the first prong of the rule set forth in Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993):

In sum, we hold that in order for a defendant to be habitualized follpwing a…