Legal Opinion
State v. Mathews
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1976No. 75-859PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
The appellant, state of Ohio, maintains that the search of Wanda Mathews’ purse was “incident” to her lawful arrest for being in a policy house; and, alternatively, that the search was made pursuant to the “stop and frisk” procedures enunciated in Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U. S. 1.
The right of police officers to search a suspect pursuant to a lawful arrest has been a long-recognized ex*74ception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement. Preston v. United States (1964), 376 U. S. 364; Draper v. United States (1959), 358 U. S. 307; Jones v. United States (1958), 357 U. S. 493; Carroll v. United…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Feliciano v. KreigerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. DarrahOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.