Legal Opinion

Genentech, Inc. v. Insmed Inc.

District Court, D. North Carolina

Decided March 9, 2006No. C-04-5429 CW (EMC)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW (Docket No. 270)

CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants Insmed Inc., Celtrix Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Insmed Therapeutic Proteins, Inc. (collectively “Insmed”) have moved to compel Plaintiff Genentech, Inc. (“Genen-tech”) to produce documents related to its U.S. Patent No. 5,187,151 (“'151 patent”), for in camera review and for production. Defendant Insmed claims that the documents at issue are not protected by the attorney-client privilege because Plaintiff Genentech…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Laser Industries, Ltd. v. Reliant Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1996
  3. Starsight Telecast, Inc. v. Gemstar Development Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
  4. Derrick Manufacturing Corp. v. Southwestern Wire Cloth, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API