Genentech, Inc. v. Insmed Inc.
District Court, D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW (Docket No. 270)
CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants Insmed Inc., Celtrix Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Insmed Therapeutic Proteins, Inc. (collectively “Insmed”) have moved to compel Plaintiff Genentech, Inc. (“Genen-tech”) to produce documents related to its U.S. Patent No. 5,187,151 (“'151 patent”), for in camera review and for production. Defendant Insmed claims that the documents at issue are not protected by the attorney-client privilege because Plaintiff Genentech…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Laser Industries, Ltd. v. Reliant Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Starsight Telecast, Inc. v. Gemstar Development Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Derrick Manufacturing Corp. v. Southwestern Wire Cloth, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996