Legal Opinion

Metro Obras, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 19, 1993No. 92-1566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In the order now under review, the trial court set aside a dismissal for lack of prosecution on the ground that the plaintiff had not been given appropriate notice. See Harris v. Filmon, 358 So.2d 905 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). This order was properly entered pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b) and is therefore affirmed. Kanecke v. Lennar Homes, Inc., 543 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Falkner v. AmeriFirst Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 489 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The merits of a dismissal under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e) remain to be decided below.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Falkner v. AMERIFIRST FEDERAL SAV. AND LOANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Kanecke v. Lennar Homes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Harris v. FilmonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MICHAEL LESINSKI v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Eugene Hamlin v. Shaughnessy Overland Express, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025