Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Wright

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 2006No. 116 MAP 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

907 A.2d 1083 (2006)

Darla FRITZ and Gordon Fritz, Appellants,

v.

Hazel WRIGHT, Carolyn Temple, Bonnie Stuart, and Samuel Wright, Individually and Doing Business as Wright's Lane Properties, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 5, 2006.

Decided October 18, 2006.

Nina B. Shapiro, Esq., for Darla Fritz and Gordon Fritz.

Gregory Buchwald Heller, Esq., for amicus curiae PA Trial Lawyers Association.

Peter Francis Schuchman, Jr., Esq., Wyomissing, for Hazel Wright, et al.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and BALDWIN, JJ.

OPINION

Justice BAER.

Appellant Gordon…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Firing v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Smith v. Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API