Schachter v. Tuggle Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Appeal; from Fulton superior court — Judge Bell. March 19, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
Even where there is no provision for the subletting of the premises, a substitution of tenants does not necessarily take place merely because the landlord receives the payment of the rent from an under-tenant to whom the original tenant has subleased the property. It requires a contract, express or implied, to bring about a substitution of tenants. Cuesta v. Goldsmith, 1 Ga. App. 48 (57 S. E. 983). “Where the lease contains an express agreement or covenant by the lessee to pay rent, he remains liable for rents to accrue, though he assigns the lease. And this liability of the lessee is not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cuesta v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Ledsinger v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. SappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Baldwin v. LampkinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Rourke Dunn v. BozarthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- WB, Ltd. v. Tobago Bay Trading Co. (In Re Tobago Bay Trading Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1991
- Johnson v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.