Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Rush

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1936No. 11008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, Justice.

In order properly to consider the assignments of error it is desirable first to set forth certain provisions of the act of 1925 (Ga. Laws 1925, p. 1480), under the authority of which the street-improvement bonds were issued. That act provides: “That the mayor and council of the City of Thomas-ville is hereby authorized and empowered to establish and change the grade of any streets, avenues, alleys, lanes, and other places in the City of Thomasville, and to improve the same by paving, macadamizing, and draining the same wdienever in its judgment the public convenience and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. DatrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Snow v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Hoskinson v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. Holt v. CLAIRMONT DEVELOPMENT CO. INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Kesot v. City of DaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API