Legal Opinion
Gaikema v. Bank of Alaska
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided February 28, 1934No. A-730PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CLEGG, District Judge.
In the state of the pleadings as above outlined, it is questionable whether the court should discuss the matter of the validity of the mortgage of August 10, 1928, in view of the fact that, in the answer filed by the defendant, in connection with, its general denial in a special additional allegation, said mortgage is specifically set up, and the same is not denied by the reply filed, and should therefore be considered as admitted. In the reply, however, to the first *505affirmative defense, in which the same mortgage is again set up with greater particularity and detail as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pacific State Bank v. CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990