In re Heyman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.
The original application for variation of the Building Zone Resolution was made under sections 7-b and 21. The minutes of the hearing before the board of standards and appeals showed that the board considered the fact that the building in question was partly in a business district and partly in a residence district. The very resolution denying the application for variation and affirming the decision of the superintendent of buildings recites that “ the board deems that applicant is not entitled to relief under sections 7-b and 21.” Nevertheless application was made for “ reopening ” of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re RikerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- People ex rel. Ridgeway v. CortelyouNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- People ex rel. Rogers v. County JudgeNew York Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by5 opinions
- MORTON v. Mayor & Council of Tp. of ClarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Ellsworth Realty Co. v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Hoerner v. TormeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Orange County Publications Division of Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. v. Council of NewburghNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Heyman v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930