Legal Opinion

Rohr v. Williams, 06 Ma 171 (12-21-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2007No. 06 MA 171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Elizabeth Rohr nka Chaplin appeals the decision of the Mahoning County Juvenile Court finding her in contempt of a prior order regarding the federal income tax dependency exemption. The issues on appeal are whether the court properly interpreted its prior order, whether the order's language was clear or ambiguous, and whether appellant's action constituted contempt. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court's suggestion that the prior order was unambiguous but affirm the trial court's interpretation of the order regarding all appealed tax years as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. GorskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. M.J.S. v. C.S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API