Legal Opinion

The State Of Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 11, 1990No. 89-9503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

908 F.2d 595

31 ERC 1741, 59 USLW 2079, 21 Envtl.

L. Rep. 20,206

The STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Oklahoma Scenic Rivers Commission and

Pollution Control Coordinating Board; Save the Illinois

River (STIR), a non-profit corporation of the State of

Oklahoma; City of Fayetteville, Arkansas; the Beaver Water

District; State of Arkansas; Arkansas Department of

Pollution Control and Ecology, Petitioners,

v.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent,

Oklahoma Wildlife Federation, Intervenor.

Nos. 89-9503, 89-9507 and 89-9516.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

July 11, 1990.

Robert A. Butkin (Robert H. Henry,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993
  3. In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API