Canzler v. Mammoliti
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that notice of appeal was not given within the time required by law.
Chronologically, the procedural facts necessary to our decision are these:
September 18, 1951, the trial court signed its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment. They had been served on appellants’ counsel on July 27th. An order of the trial judge found that these were signed with full knowledge of appellants’ counsel.
September 27th, counsel filed a motion to vacate the judgment and for a new trial. It was not served upon counsel for respondent until October…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Quareles v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Chilcott v. Globe Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Cinebar Coal & Coke Co. v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Sellars v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of HarshmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- National Steel Construction Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Griffin v. DraperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- In Re the Estate of CraneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Wallen v. NoeWashington Supreme Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.