Cox v. Bishop
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
Petitioners S. E. Cox and wife filed a penalty suit under article 5073, R. S., in Potter county, against the Metropolitan Building & Loan Association et al., charging the collection in said county by defendants of usurious interest from petitioners.
A plea' in abatement was filed by the defendants in this suit, and it was therein alleged, in substance and effect, that a suit had theretofore been filed by them against the same Cox and wife in Dallas county for a balance upon certain promissory notes and for foreclosure of a lien upon Potter county property. They alleged an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Haney v. Temple Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Smith v. StevensTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Stokes v. Temple Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gerard v. National Bond & Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Cox v. Metropolitan Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Weaver v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942