Legal Opinion

Cox v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 5, 1933No. 4139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Petitioners S. E. Cox and wife filed a penalty suit under article 5073, R. S., in Potter county, against the Metropolitan Building & Loan Association et al., charging the collection in said county by defendants of usurious interest from petitioners.

A plea' in abatement was filed by the defendants in this suit, and it was therein alleged, in substance and effect, that a suit had theretofore been filed by them against the same Cox and wife in Dallas county for a balance upon certain promissory notes and for foreclosure of a lien upon Potter county property. They alleged an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Haney v. Temple Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Smith v. StevensTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Stokes v. Temple Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerard v. National Bond & Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Cox v. Metropolitan Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Weaver v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API