Legal Opinion

Davis v. Lunceford

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 1, 1980No. 21214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

This action was instituted by service of a summons, without a complaint. The question to be decided is whether the lower court erred in refusing to dismiss the summons for failure, after demand, to timely serve the complaint.

Section 15-13-230, S. C. Code of Laws, 1976, permits the service of a summons without a complaint, but requires that the complaint be served upon demand. This section states:

*578A copy of the complaint need not be served with the summons .... But if a copy of the complaint be not so served the summons must state where the complaint is or will be filed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lee v. PeekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Worrell v. SATTERFIELD CONST. CO., INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Commercial Credit Corp. v. KnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. LuncefordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Davis v. LuncefordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Lord Jeff Knitting Co., Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Price v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Davis v. LuncefordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API