Davis v. Lunceford
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, Chief Justice:
This action was instituted by service of a summons, without a complaint. The question to be decided is whether the lower court erred in refusing to dismiss the summons for failure, after demand, to timely serve the complaint.
Section 15-13-230, S. C. Code of Laws, 1976, permits the service of a summons without a complaint, but requires that the complaint be served upon demand. This section states:
*578A copy of the complaint need not be served with the summons .... But if a copy of the complaint be not so served the summons must state where the complaint is or will be filed,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lee v. PeekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Worrell v. SATTERFIELD CONST. CO., INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. KnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. LuncefordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Davis v. LuncefordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
- Lord Jeff Knitting Co., Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Price v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Davis v. LuncefordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.