Legal Opinion

Scala v. Miners' & Merchants' Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 1918No. 8702PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. Neil F. Graham, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Plaintiff in error seeks to recover $661.80 from the defendant bank, upon the theory that it is liable to him for that amount, which it paid out on a check bearing a forged indorsement, from funds then held by the bank to his credit. The defendant received judgment in the court below, and that judgment is here for review.

*186The facts necessary to be considered are that plaintiff had on deposit with defendant certain funds belonging to an estate of which he was administrator. The amount was evidenced by a certificate of deposit to the order of plaintiff as administrator. It became necessary for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boatsman v. Stockmen's National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  2. Goodfellow v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Bi-Metallic BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SuazoColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Commercial Credit Corporation, a Corporation v. Empire Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. Hansen v. Northwestern National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Harsin Motor Co. v. Colorado Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Miller v. Phoenix Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API