Legal Opinion
Opinion No. Oag 48-75, (1975)
Wisconsin Attorney General Reports
Decided November 5, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. KIDD, Secretary, Department of Business Development
You have called my attention to two fact situations relating to the construction of facilities for use by physicians and others providing health care. In each situation, you ask whether the proposed facility will qualify as a "clinic" under sec. 66.521 (2) (b) 7, Stats. If so qualified, in either case, the "clinic" would be a "project" subject to the industrial development revenue bond law and its construction could be financed with revenue bonds issued pursuant to that law.
It is my opinion that neither of the proposed facilities…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Van Dyke v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. Dobbs Ferry Medical Pavillion, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Deibel v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1957