Legal Opinion
David Vang v. City of Fresno, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 25, 2026No. 1:26-cv-06955Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DAVID VANG, Case No. 1:26-cv-06955-KES-EGC 10 Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER; ORDER 11 v. FOR PLAINTIFF TO: 12 (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 13 CITY OF FRESNO, et al., (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE 14 Defendants. WISHES TO STAND ON HIS COMPLAINT; OR 15 (3) FILE A NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 16 DISMISSAL 17 (Doc. 1) 18 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 19 20 On August 31, 2026, David Vang (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint 21 against the City of Fresno and its officials (Fresno City Attorney Andrew Janz, City…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.