Legal Opinion

Dr. Mohamed R. Mahfouz, as Seller’s Representative and on behalf of TechMah CMF LLC v. DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 4, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00445Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE DR. MOHAMED R. MAHFOUZ, ) as Seller’s Representative and on behalf of ) TechMah CMF LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 25-445-JLH-EGT ) DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM ORDER Presently before the Court is the renewed motion of Plaintiff Mohamed R. Mahfouz (“Plaintiff”) for leave to amend the complaint. (D.I. 142). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND The Court set forth a detailed factual background in a prior opinion. (See D.I. 43…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Nemec v. ShraderSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor v. Arco Chemical Company and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Bechtel v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API