Legal Opinion

In re United States for an Order Authorizing the Interception of Oral Communications at the Premises Known as Calle Mayaguez 212

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 27, 1983No. 82-1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge.

I

Early in 1981, attorneys in the Puerto Rico United States Attorney’s office and attorneys in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice were informed that certain individuals, including attorney Farinacci and several of his clients, were using his law office, located at Calle Mayaguez 212 (the premises), as a meeting place to plan activities in violation of federal law. The government submitted an application, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (1982), to the district court in Puerto Rico for electronic surveillance of the premises. The application set forth the fact…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of the Application of the United States for an Order Authorizing the Interception of Oral Communications at the Premises Known as Calle Mayaguez 212, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. Appeal of Jose E. CarrerasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API