Legal Opinion
Monster Energy Company v. Beastup LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 15, 2022No. 2:17-cv-01605Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Monster Energy Company, No. 2:17-cv-01605-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER; FINDINGS OF FACT B AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 14) BeastUp LLC, 1S Defendant. 16 17 The court conducted a bench trial from December 7 to December 9, 2021 on plaintiff 18 | Monster Energy Company’s claims against defendant BeastUp LLC. Monster asserts six claims: 19 1. Trademark infringement and false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. 20 § 1125(a); 21 2. Trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114; 22 3. Trademark dilution under…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.