Epstein v. Hankinson
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from City Court of New York. Action by Samuel Epstein against J. Charles Hankinson. From a City Court judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.
The amended complaint alleges the furnishing of certain materials and the performance of certain services at the *584instance and request of the defendant between March 1, 1901,’ and April 17, 1901, and that the fair and reasonable value of said materials and labor was $1,151.13, of which $201.13 remained due. Judgment was rendered for the balance claimed due. The defendant employed the plaintiff to place certain mirrors in a building on Broadway, which was being erected by the defendant as a contractor. No price was agreed upon as to the value of the work. When plaintiff completed his contract,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Griffin v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Milbank v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Societa Italiana Di Beneficenza v. SulzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Brady v. HutkoffThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895