Blauner v. Katz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
It is clear both from the complaint and from plaintiff’s testimony that his brokerage commission was contingent on his obtaining a purchaser ready, willing and able to purchase either the property constituting the country club or, what was deemed the equivalent of the property — all of the stock of the corporation owning the club. The second cause of action alleged an agreement “ that if a sale was effectuated by the plaintiff of the real and personal property of defendants in this cause of action, the said defendants in this cause of action would pay the stipulated commission to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Globerman v. LedererAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Muldoon v. SilvestreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Carpenter v. Atlas Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- M. Curt Meltzer v. Crescent Leaseholds, Ltd., and Albert GarehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971