Legal Opinion

Bakal v. S. Rosenfelder & Son, Inc.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 24, 1933Published

1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.

The action is brought to recover the purchase price paid in advance of certain goods, wares and merchandise which it is claimed the defendant failed to deliver. The cause is set for trial on the commercial calendar of this court June 6, 1933. A motion is now made by the defendant to suppress the depositions taken of certain witnesses, upon the grounds (1) that the depositions were not read to the witnesses before they subscribed them, pursuant to rule 129 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and (2) that the depositions were not filed with the clerk of this court within ten days after their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartwig v. American Malting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Anna McNally, Inc. v. ChapinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Faith v. Ulster & Delaware RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Israel v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Lowther v. SullivanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API