Legal Opinion
Cadwell v. Teaney
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1927No. 25,217PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTravis, C. J.
This is a suit by information in the nature of a quo warranto by the appellees who were the relators in the court below against the appellants who were respondents. (§§1208, 1209, 1212/1215 and 1218 Burns 1926). Relators Libbert, Marshall, Dorrell and Thompson were elected at the general election November, 1921, to the offices of mayor, councilman for the first ward, councilman for the second ward, and councilman at large, respectively, for the city of Aurora. Respondents Teaney and Fleming were members of the common council of said city by virtue of an election held in November, 1921. Their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Catterlin v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Ferris v. UdellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Hawkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Commonwealth ex rel. Morris v. StevensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Kent v. FullenloveIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- New York Central Railroad v. MilhiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Albert v. Milk Control Board of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Civil City of South Bend v. Court of Appeals of Indiana-Third DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Bailer v. DowdIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Morton v. City of AuroraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.