Legal Opinion

Huffstutler v. Reese

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 24, 1987No. Civ. 5962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellants (Personnel Board) sought a writ of mandamus to force the appellees (Water and Sewer Board) to remove Clayton Guy from his employment as a consultant to the Water and Sewer Board. The Personnel Board appeals the trial court's denial of that petition.

Clayton Guy had been a member of the Water and Sewer Board for seven years prior to his being hired to his present position, the nature of which is the issue at bar. The Personnel Board complains that Guy's employment is contrary to the laws of the Personnel Board, alleging that he was hired outside the merit system as a "consultant"…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Best v. State Dept. of RevenueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Freeman v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Perry v. State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Kilgore v. Jasper City Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Crouch v. Allen, 2100279 (ala.civ.app. 7-22-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Nelson v. Etowah County Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Tatum v. FreemanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API