Legal Opinion
Kagan v. Taylor
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 8, 1983No. 81 CIV 3629PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This is a suit on an insurance policy. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The parties have filed motions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment. For the reasons developed below, the motions are denied.
FACTS
Plaintiffs allege that on December 14, 1980, their home in Staten Island, New York was burglarized, and that $136,890 of their jewelry was taken. It is undisputed that the jewelry was specifically insured by defendant under Lloyd’s All Risks Policy No. 882/71533 (“the policy”), which provided coverage in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Billy Baxter, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company and Cana Da Dry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Myers v. GockleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SCW West LLC v. Westport InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Barbagallo v. GregorySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Harary v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Richie's Corner, Inc. v. National Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Jim Sheldon Excavating, Inc & Taran Bros., Inc. Act 250 LU PermitVermont Superior Court · 2009