Legal Opinion
Rindal v. Inslee
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 10, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00890Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 STEVEN MICHAEL RINDAL, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00890-TL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR v. EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR 13 ROBERT WATSON FERGUSON et al., LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED 14 COMPLAINT Defendants. 15 16 17 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Steven Michael Rindal’s “Motion for 18 Extension of Time and Leave to File Amended Complaint with Respectful Apology.” Dkt. 19 No. 70. On May 9, 2025, the Court dismissed this case without prejudice and entered judgment; 20 the case has been closed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Walter Bateman v. United States Postal Service William J. Henderson, 1 Postmaster General, and Aaron Johnson Ben Fukumitsu David Burns Jose MallariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jesus Briones v. Riviera Hotel & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Laffit Pincay, Jr. Christopher J. McCarron v. Vincent S. Andrews Robert Andrews Vincent Andrews Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.