Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brister v. Brister

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 28, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

There is no order allowing this appeal from a judgment in habeas corpus as required by Section 79.11, Fla. Stat. 1941, F.S.A., therefore we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment arid the appeal is dismissed upon authority of Ex parte Finch, 15 Fla. 630; Wright et al. v. State, 32 Fla. 472, 14 So. 43; State ex rel Wilson v. Quigg, 154 Fla. 348, 17 So. 2d. 697.

Appeal dismissed.

THOMAS, C.J., BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., and HARRY N. SANDLER, Associate Justice, concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  3. Ex parte FinchSupreme Court of Florida · 1876

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Callahan v. MichellSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  3. Griffith v. State ex rel. CrownoverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. McDonald v. FratesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961