Legal Opinion
Andrew C. v. Oracle America Inc. Flexible Benefit Plan
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 27, 2020No. 4:17-cv-02072Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ANDREW C. AND ROBERT C., Case No.: 17-CV-2072-YGR 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT 10 IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND DENYING v. DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION 11 ORACLE AMERICA INC. FLEXIBLE BENEFIT Dkt. Nos. 70, 71 12 PLAN, UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, et. al. 13 Defendants. 14 15 Presently before the Court are cross-motions for judgment on plaintiffs’ claim for health 16 benefits under a plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 17 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. filed by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Salomaa v. Honda Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.