Legal Opinion

Purkey v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 20, 1983No. 09 82 066 CRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIES, Chief Justice.

This appeal is brought on two (2) grounds of error from an aggravated rape conviction wherein punishment was assessed at ninety-nine (99) years in the Texas Department of Corrections.

The first ground of error raises the issue of whether or not identification of a de fendant by name only is sufficient to sustain a conviction. Specifically, appellant is contending that without an in court identification, such as pointing at appellant or describing his attire, the evidence is insufficient to establish that appellant’s identity is one and the same as that of the alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rohlfing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Chvojka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Norton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  2. Hime v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  3. Janak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Sepulveda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  5. John Anthony Adams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API