Legal Opinion

Railroad Co. v. Dubois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1871PublishedCited by 30 opinions

, Error to the Circuit Court for the District of Maryland. Dubois brought suit against the Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Company, for damages for an infringement of a patent granted to him September 23d, 1862, for “ a new and useful improvement in the mode of building piers for bridges and other structures and setting the same.”

Read the full summary

, Error to the Circuit Court for the District of Maryland. Dubois brought suit against the Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Company, for damages for an infringement of a patent granted to him September 23d, 1862, for “ a new and useful improvement in the mode of building piers for bridges and other structures and setting the same.” The alleged improvement was asserted to have been used by the company in building their railroad bridge across-the Susquehanna at Havre de Grace. In bis specification, Dubois, the patentee, after reference to diagrams accompanying his schedule, thus…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strong

The court below, refusing to give the first instruction asked for by the defendants, construed the first claim in the plaintiff’s patent to be, not for a process, but for a device, or instrument to be employed in a process, the instrument being a floating coffer-dam constructed as described in the specification, in which the masonry of the pier might be laid and sunk to the foundation by its own gravity. In this it is now insisted the court erred. . We are.of opinion, however, that the construction given to this claim was correct, and that the defendants were not entitled to an affirmative…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. The" Sunnyside"Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Special Equipment Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. The " America."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Avco Manufacturing Corporation and the Harry Alter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  5. Cold Metal Process Co. v. UNITED STATES ENG. & FOUNDRY CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API