Legal Opinion
Morrison v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 6, 1925No. A-4751PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant. The defendant was convicted of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor in the municipal criminal court of the city of Tulsa and appeals by case-made which does not contain the evidence.
Several assignments of error are presented in the very able brief by counsel for defendant, several of which are directed to the constitutionality of the act of the Legislature creating the said court. The contention that the creation of the court is unconstitutional has been decided adversely to the contention of defendant in the case of Buchanan v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Soper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- Opinion of the JudgesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Mougell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Crawford v. BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Staley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Conti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.