Legal Opinion

People v. Quinn

Suffolk County District Court

Decided October 24, 1991PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*140OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter G. Dounias, J.

Defendant Mary Quinn stands charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of a drug, to wit, cocaine, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (4). At issue before the court is whether certain evidence sought to be introduced at trial by the People meets the standards of admissibility set forth in Frye v United States (293 F 1013 [DC Cir 1923]) and People v Middleton (54 NY2d 42 [1981]). The pertinent facts are as follows:

Defendant was arrested in the early morning hours of August 1, 1988 by Troopers Brian M. Kennedy and E. S.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. MiddletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Selkowitz v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State v. BressonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. State v. BaityWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BaityWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. KlawitterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. MerrittConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API