Legal Opinion

Steinmuller v. City of Kansas City

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 1, 1896No. 129PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Memorandum.— Error from Wyandotte district court; Henry L. Auden, judge. Action by George Steinmuller and others against the city of Kansas City and others for an injunction. Judgment for defendants. The plaintiffs bring the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garver, J. :

On September 3, 1891, the plaintiffs in error filed their petition in the district court of *46Wyandotte county, seeking to enjoin the defendants in error from collecting a certain assessment 'which the city of Kansas City sought to enforce against their lots for the cost of grading the street upon which the lots fronted. The court below sustained a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ evidence, and rendered judgment in favor of the defendants for costs.

The evidence tended to prove that, on August 14, 1888, a petition was presented to the mayor and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of New Haven v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. Moore v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. City of Leavenworth v. RankinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  4. Williams v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Shoat v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Hillsborough County v. Desear, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API