Legal Opinion

Ware v. McQuinn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1894No. 764PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Coryell.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

The appellant brought this suit in the nature of trespass to try title to recover a part of the L. B. Weeden survey. The court below established and fixed the south line of the Weeden survey in the judgment rendered, and, as we understand the case, it did not include the land sued for; therefore judgment was rendered for appellee, the defendant below.

There is no statement of facts in the record, and the case comes to this court upon the following conclusions of fact found by the trial court, which we adopt as the facts found by this court:

“That the Joseph Merrill 640…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maddox Bros. & Anderson v. FennerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Gerald v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Welder v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Booth v. StripplemanTexas Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Fagan v. StonerTexas Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Turner v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dunn v. LandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Polk County v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Love v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API