Legal Opinion

Matter of Nakell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1991No. 9016SC403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Nakell first contends Judge Lake erred in denying his motion for the judge to recuse himself from the hearing on 16 November 1989. Nakell argues that “North Carolina statutory and case law establish that a judge must disqualify himself upon motion of a party if he is unable to render an impartial decision because of prejudice or a reasonable suspicion of his impartiality.”

G.S. 15A-1223(b) in pertinent part provides:

A judge on motion of the State or the defendant, must disqualify himself from presiding over a criminal trial or other criminal proceeding if he is: (1)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. O'Briant v. O'BriantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. FieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of Johnston v. City of WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Columbus County D.S.S. ex rel. Moore v. NortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API