Walker v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Criminal law. Practice. Demand for trial. Before Judge Martin. Marion superior court. April adjourned term, 1892. After conviction of a misdemeanor, the defendant excepted to the overruling of his motion for discharge on the following facts : The indictment was found at the April term, 1891, of the superior court, at which term the case was continued by the State.
Read the full summary
Criminal law. Practice. Demand for trial. Before Judge Martin. Marion superior court. April adjourned term, 1892. After conviction of a misdemeanor, the defendant excepted to the overruling of his motion for discharge on the following facts : The indictment was found at the April term, 1891, of the superior court, at which term the case was continued by the State. At the same term the defendant placed his demand for trial on the minutes of the court, and a jury was empanelled competent to try the ease. At the next term a jury competent to try the case was again empanelled, but the case was…
1Opinion of the Court
*482 Judgment reversed.
Worrill & Little, for plaintiff in error. A. A. Carson, solicitor-general, by Harrison & Peeples, contra.
2Cited by38 opinions
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- State v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- State v. KuhnIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Flagg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Nix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.