Legal Opinion
Schrader v. Fred A. Ray, M.D., P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 16, 2002No. 00-5224PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Alexis Kim Schrader appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Fred A. Ray, M.D., P.C. (“Ray”), on Schrader’s complaint brought pursuant to § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 794 (the “Rehabilitation Act”). The district court held that Ray is not subject to liability under § 504 because it has less than fifteen employees. In this appeal, we hold that § 504(d) of the Rehabilitation Act, which incorporates the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. DarroneSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vega v. ZavarasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Bonita McDonald v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, Polk CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Jane Niehaus and Joyce Neumann v. Kansas Bar Association, John Gardner, and Marcia PoellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Powers v. MJB Acquisition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Levy v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Cortés-Rivera v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Pinkerton v. SpellingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- McGeshick v. PrincipiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.