Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Kwaterski Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1935No. Appeal, 76PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This appeal is from a judgment of the Superior Court, reported in 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 53, 174 A. 596.

Fitzgerald and wife filed a hill against Kwaterski and wife for a decree concerning the status of an easement on lot No. 29, * for the benefit of which, plaintiffs alleged, it was agreed by defendants that an easement would be created. The trial court dismissed the bill. The Superior Court reversed, and remanded the record with instructions to enter a decree in favor of the Dukovics, “their heirs and assigns, tenants and occupiers of the adjoining premises.” The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartley v. LangkampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Hanna, Admr. v. Chester TimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Fitzgerald v. KwaterskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. County of BucksCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. ZIMMERMANN v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
  3. ZIMMERMANN v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API