Wininger v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Martin Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.
This was a prosecution for a riot. Trial by the Court; finding of guilty, and judgment, over a motion for a new trial.
The evidence is in the record, and, upon the part of the state, was sufficient to authorize the finding; but the witness, without objection, stated that the defendants had *541each been fined three dollars, by a justice, for the same act, upon a prosecution for an assault and battery. It is further shown, by the bill of exceptions, that during the trial “it was admitted before the Court, by the prosecuting attorney, that all of the defendants had been legally tried for the same…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ElderIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- State v. GapenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Greenwood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- State v. RosenbaumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.