Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bilby v. Noble

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1925No. 13477PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

This controversy involves lands allotted to Mary Tiger, a duly enrolled, full-blood Creek Indian, who died, intestate, in May, 1910, seized and possessed of her allotment, and left surviving her husband, Ben Tiger, and- Mandy Noble, nee Tiger, and Annie Tiger, daughters, and John Washington Tiger, son, all full-blood Creek Indians. In 1915, Ben Tiger died, intestate, seized of his inherited interest in said lands and left surviving, as his next of kin and heirs at law, Hattie Tiger, his wife by second marriage, and Newman Tiger, a son by said second marriage, and' the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnard v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Eastern Oil Co. v. HarjoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Lewis v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hardridge v. HardridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Emery v. GoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Emery v. GoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Ryburn v. CarneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. March v. PeterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API