Legal Opinion

Cheney Bros. v. Weinreb & Weinreb

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 18, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Cheney Bros, against Weinreb & Weinreb. On' demurrer to the bill of complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The demurrer, in my judgment, is entirely without merit, and contrary to any -reasonable implication of the words of the statute. Section 4933, Rev. St. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3399), provides that:

“All the regulations and provisions which apply to obtaining or protecting patents for invention or discoveries not inconsistent with the provisions of this title shall apply to patents for designs.”

The demurrant relies on the provision in section 4888, Rev. St. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901,' p. 3383), that the inventor shall file in the Patent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James E. Tompkins Co. v. New York Woven Wire Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. Bennett v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanson Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Warren Knitting Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. National Casket Co. v. New York & Brooklyn Casket Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API