Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Boggs

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Hinsdale County.

1Per curiam

In taking his appeal, the appellant in this case has followed the practice prescribed by the Revised Statutes. The conditions of the appeal bond prescribed by section 41 of the Practice Act (R. S. 513), show that an appeal by a party in whose favor a judgment or decree is rendered, was not contemplated by the statute. The condition that the appellant shall pay the judgment, costs, interest and damages, in case the judgment shall be affirmed, can only apply where the party, against whom the judgment is rendered, is the appellant.

A party, in whose favor a judgment is rendered, cannot appeal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Addix v. FahnestockIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Travelers Ins.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Lockhaven Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Lockhaven Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API