Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between American Transit Insurance & Lewis

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*731OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

At issue on this motion is whether purchasing an index number and filing a notice of petition within 20 days of receipt of the demand for arbitration and effecting service within 15 days of such filing constitutes a timely application to stay arbitration under CPLR 7503 (c) when no petition was in existence on the date of the filing of the notice of petition.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Petitioner received respondent’s demand for uninsured motorist arbitration on February 8, 1993. Thereafter, on Monday, March 1, 1993, petitioner purchased an index…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lebow v. Village of Lansing Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Long Island Citizens Campaign, Inc. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MaloneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. De Maria v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Citizens Against Sprawl-Mart v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. William Court — White Hill Road Homeowners Ass'n v. New York State Commissioner of Mental Retardation & Developmental DisabilitiesNew York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API