Schluckebier v. Babcock
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Columbia county: R. G. Siebeckeb, Circuit Judge. An issue, on appeal from county court by the present respondents, was tried in the circuit court for Columbia county on the 18th day of May, 1898. Bindings were made and filed, and judgment entered, on June 6th, and notice of entry of judgment was duly served on the attorneys for these appellants on the 26th day of July.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Columbia county: R. G. Siebeckeb, Circuit Judge. An issue, on appeal from county court by the present respondents, was tried in the circuit court for Columbia county on the 18th day of May, 1898. Bindings were made and filed, and judgment entered, on June 6th, and notice of entry of judgment was duly served on the attorneys for these appellants on the 26th day of July. An extension of time to settle the hill of exceptions was granted to som© time in December. Ro exceptions to the findings, were filed. On February 1, 1899, appellants served notice…
1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.
The record not only fails to show any adequate excuse for the delay for more than six months from ihe entry of the judgment, but it also fails wholly to show that a bill of exceptions could be of any advantage to the appellants if settled. Upon no subject is the discretion of the trial court broader than upon applications by parties in , default for favors and extensions of time in matters of mere procedure, such as this. ¥e discover no abuse of such discretion here.
By the Oourt.— Order appealed from affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Ward v. Board of Trustees of Racine CollegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- McElroy v. Minnesota Percheron Horse Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901