Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of John Russo

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 14, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, Judge:

I felt it.necessary to appoint counsel to represent the interests of the two minor children in this proceeding and as the result of argument and briefs filed for the respective parties, a single question is presented for decisión, viz.: Should a fund representing a voluntary and unauthorized settlement with a common carrier under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, resulting from a claim for death, be distributed under the intestate laws of this state or in accordance with the actual pecuniary loss sustained by the dependents of the deceased?

In Gulf, C. & S. F. R. R. Co. v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Haidacker v. Central R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943
  5. Patterson v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Southern Steamship Company's PetitionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  2. In Re Russo's EstateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API