In Re Estate of John Russo
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, Judge:
I felt it.necessary to appoint counsel to represent the interests of the two minor children in this proceeding and as the result of argument and briefs filed for the respective parties, a single question is presented for decisión, viz.: Should a fund representing a voluntary and unauthorized settlement with a common carrier under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, resulting from a claim for death, be distributed under the intestate laws of this state or in accordance with the actual pecuniary loss sustained by the dependents of the deceased?
In Gulf, C. & S. F. R. R. Co. v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Haidacker v. Central R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943
- Patterson v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Southern Steamship Company's PetitionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- In Re Russo's EstateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952