Killian v. Cleveland Ry Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
VICKERY, PJ.
It seems that the plaintiff and Turk were very close friends and were almost inseparable companions. Turk apparently was very much interested in the plaintiff’s lawsuit and was on the train or car with her *15when the alleged injury is supposed to have taken place, and he had just alighted from the car when, it is claimed, she. attempted to alight and was injured in the manner described in the petition.
No claim was made at the time for any injury nor did she 'complain to the Conductor nor to anybody in charge of the train or car that she had been injured. Subsequently, not very long…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RodriguezOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
- James v. FranksOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. PolhamusOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Falls Lumber Co. v. HemanSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1962