Legal Opinion
State v. Abdo
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 2018No. 28250, 28251PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Background
[¶ 2.] On the evening of January 7, 2016, Roseanne Weddell, Winston Houseman, John Abdo, Philomene Boneshirt, and Hazen Winckler were watching television together in a home owned by Shelly Selwyn in Wagner, South Dakota. Roseanne is Shelly's daughter. Shelly did not live in the home but allowed Roseanne and Roseanne's now-husband Winston to live there. Winston later testified that Abdo (Winston's nephew) also stayed at the home from time to time and had been staying there during the two weeks preceding January 7, 2016. Philomene was Abdo's girlfriend. Hazen was an acquaintance.
[¶…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Harvey M. RenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. James A. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- State v. KnechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KrouseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. PackardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Abdo v. LarsonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020